Search Results for "Commissioner Clarification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Commissioner Clarification"

968 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 968 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

16 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Sugar Cane Reservation Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Government Notification. Court holds that notification under Section 21 of the Karnataka Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961 must be based on actual production capacity and not on installed capacity.

21 Nov 2025

The case involves a dispute over the reservation of cane supply area under the Karnataka Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961. The...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Order Passed Under Section 271D of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Penalty Was Imposed for Alleged Violation of Section 269SS Regarding Cash Loans.

25 Feb 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Lack of Proper Opportunity of Hearing and Non-Communication of Section 151 Approval in Income Tax Reopening Proceedings. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to grant a personal hearing as directed by the earlier order of the High Court and did not communicate the approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rendering the reassessment invalid.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Wavy Construction LLP, challenged an order dated 14 October 2021 rejecting its objections against reopening of assessment under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

12 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows University Appeal in Increment Dispute Under UGC Scheme. Two Advance Increments Denied to Lecturer Holding Ph.D. on Placement as Selection Grade Lecturer Upheld.

10 May 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which directed the Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit to grant two advance i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Charity Commissioner's Scheme in Trust Dispute. Court upholds exclusive jurisdiction of Charity Commissioner under Section 50 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 to frame scheme for public trust.

5 Oct 2018

The petitioners, who were trustees of a trust, filed writ petitions challenging the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner framing a scheme for the m...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of CL-2 Excise Licences for Alleged Distance Violation. Held that Rule 8(1) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 does not apply to shops existing before the 2002 amendment and that cancellation without proper notice violates natural justice.

22 Aug 2017

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnat...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Cancellation of CL-2 Licences for Alleged Distance Violation — Held That Rule 8(2) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 Does Not Apply to Shops Existing Before 2002 Amendment and That Show Cause Notice Must Precede Cancellation.

22 Aug 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnataka...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Commissioner's Order on Building Proposal Validity — Held That Commissioner's Decision Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Is Final and Not Subject to Judicial Review on Merits.

11 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s Mahendra Builders, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order d...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)