Search Results for "Chief Settlement Commissioner"

294 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 294 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Jurisdictional Limits on State Interference in Land Rights: State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012

The case arose from a dispute involving land/tenancy rights and administrative interference by State authorities in West Bengal. The High Court had se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Evacuee Property Dispute, Upholding Sale of Specified Area Under Displaced Persons Act. Property Transfer Limited to Area in Sale Certificate and Conveyance Deed, with Additional Areas Requiring Payment as per Chief Settlement Commissioner's Orders Under Section 24(1).

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a property dispute concerning 'Spring Field', an evacuee property in Shimla. The appellants, legal heir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Consolidation Orders Under Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Petitioners Failed to Challenge Earlier Orders in Time, and Subsequent Orders Were Merely Consequential.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a letter dated 2nd February 1990 and a notice dated 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Second Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Mutation Entry Validity. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that the Civil Court's decree regarding possession was binding on revenue authorities.

The case involves a land dispute between the petitioners (legal heirs of Dattu Appa Patil) and respondent 3 (Rama Yesaba Patil) over mutation entries ...