Search Results for "Cenvat Credit"

99 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 99 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cenvat Credit on Input Services for Sugar Manufacturing Upheld. Transportation of Sugarcane from Farm to Factory Gate Held as Input Service Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

The Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs, Belgaum) appealed against the Final Order No.20105/2014 dated 28.1.2014 passed by the CESTAT, Ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows CENVAT Credit on GTA Service for Cement Manufacturer — Place of Removal Includes Buyer's Destination. Interpretation of 'Place of Removal' under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for outward transportation of goods sold on FOR destination basis.

The appellant, M/s. Madras Cements Limited, a manufacturer of cement, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Stay Order in Cenvat Credit Dispute. Tribunal's Detailed Findings at Stay Stage Prejudge the Appeal and Are Impermissible.

The appellant, CEAT Limited, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 12th June 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Petition Against Rebate Claim on Exported Inputs/Capital Goods. Reversal of Cenvat Credit Does Not Constitute Payment of Duty for Rebate Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary to the Government of India dated 4 June 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Mobile Phone Services. Circular Restricting Credit Held Not Binding as Statutory Rules Allow Credit for Input Services Used in Relation to Business.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...