Search Results for "CAT Full Bench"

144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Appoint Recommended Candidate for Judicial Service — Failure to Disclose Adverse Material Violates Natural Justice. The Court Quashed Communications Denying Appointment and Directed Reconsideration After Providing Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioner, Suhas Arun Malve, an advocate practicing since 2004, applied for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, Fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Foreign Allowance Revision for ITEC Deputationists. Policy decision on allowance rates not subject to judicial review unless arbitrary or mala fide.

The petitioner, Basant Kumar Bihani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 1st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds CAT Order Directing NIMHANS to Grant Child Care Leave to Employee. Child Care Leave is a Statutory Right Under Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972, Not a Discretionary Benefit.

The petitioner, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), challenged an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010115872016_1

...