Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Central Administrative Tribunal Order Regarding Promotion to Custom Appraiser in Customs Department. Petitioners sought quashing of the Tribunal's order dated 03.09.2010 in O.A.No.12 of 2010 and direction to grant them notional promotion as Inspector (Examiner) from 20.10.2003, and to interdict promotion of juniors to Custom Appraiser without first considering petitioners.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
Admin
2026-10-21 01:35:33
  • 82
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

W.P.Nos.20743 & 20744 of 2010 &

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 158

W.P.Nos.20743 & 20744 of 2010 & W.P.No.4669 of 2011

2025-02-19

Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth, Justice G. Arul Murugan

2025:MHC:446

Mr. Karthik Rajan for petitioners; Mr. A.P. Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel for R1 to R3; Mr. Akbar Row for R23, 27 & 28; Mr. P.V.S. Giridhar Senior Counsel for Ms. Y. Kavitha for R24 to R26

Aruna Venkatesh and Others

Union of India and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Service law - Promotion and seniority dispute in Customs Department

Remedy Sought

To quash the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 03.09.2010 in O.A.No.12 of 2010 and to direct respondents to grant petitioners notional promotion as Inspector (Examiner) from 20.10.2003 and consider them for promotion as Custom Appraiser before their juniors.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal allegedly failed to grant appropriate relief regarding seniority and promotion.

Previous Decisions

Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, order dated 03.09.2010 in O.A.No.12 of 2010; also reference to pending W.P.No.28333 of 2003.

Procedural History

Original Application No.12 of 2010 filed before Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench; order passed on 03.09.2010. Aggrieved by that order, petitioners filed W.P.Nos.20743 & 20744 of 2010 & W.P.No.4669 of 2011 under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Judicature at Madras. Also reference to earlier writ petition W.P.No.28333 of 2003 which was pending.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
promotion Custom Appraiser Inspector (Examiner) certiorarified mandamus Central Administrative Tribunal notional promotion seniority

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Defendant's Application for Return of Plaint in Trademark Infringement Suit — Issues of Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 134(2) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Order VII Rule 10 CPC. Plaint Lacks Averments That Plaint... 2026-10-25 17:12:42
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Dispute Over Title Cannot Be Decided in Revenue Proceedings Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. 2026-10-25 17:12:40
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof land acquisition limitation Article 226 Jurisdiction
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Temple Property Gift — Affirms State's Cust...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Charge Framing in Corruption Case — Upholds High ...

Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Deputy Registrar in University Disciplinary Proceedings D...

Lost Your Password?