Search Results for "Assistant Commissioner order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Assistant Commissioner order"

5379 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5379 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Insufficient Time Between Endorsement of In-Camera Statements and Issuance of Detention Order. The court held that the Detaining Authority did not have sufficient time to apply its mind properly, vitiating the detention order under Section 2(a)(iv-a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

10 Oct 2016

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Nilesh Dnyaneshwar Desale, challenged the detention order dated 16.3.2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Ja...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Support Apprehension of Bail. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application; Detaining Authority's Satisfaction of Imminent Release Held Unsubstantiated.

14 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Sagar Sunil Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 27 September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

3 Mar 2023

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Verify Secret Statements Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid, Making Detention Order Unsustainable.

3 Mar 2016

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Dipak alias D. Baba Kashinath Kamble, challenged a detention order dated 7 August 2015 issued by the Commissione...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, Adjudicates Bunch of Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal Order on Seniority in Maharashtra Development Service Cadre. Dispute Pertains to Interpretation of Recruitment Quota Rules under Maharashtra Development Service (Constitution, Classification and Recruitment) Rules, 1973, and Whether Promotions Exceeding Quota Are Fortuitous.

21 Mar 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard a bunch of writ petitions arising from a common order of the Maharashtra Administra...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Considers Powers of Deputy Commissioner in Caste Certificate Revision Under Karnataka SC/ST and Other BC (Reservation of Appointments, etc.) Act, 1990. Court frames substantial questions of law regarding whether Deputy Commissioner can reverse caste certificate without Caste Verification Committee report.

30 Jun 2025

The matter concerned the validity of a caste certificate issued to Sri Ravindra Swamy, who claimed Scheduled Caste status as 'Beda Jangama'. The dispu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act for Dangerous Person. Detention Order Based on Past Criminal Activities and In-Camera Statements Upheld as Valid Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

21 Oct 2010

The petitioner, brother of the detenue Surendra @ Surya Daulat Desai, challenged a detention order dated 15th March 2010 issued by the Commissioner of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Externment Orders Under Maharashtra Police Act — Clarifies Conditions for Section 56(1)(a) and (b) and Requirement of Witness Fear. The court held that each clause has distinct requirements and the authority must apply mind to proportionality and natural justice.

8 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act, 1981 Citing Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Flaws. Detention Based on Stale Past Incidents and Improper Communication of Right to Representation Raises Concerns Under Article 22(5).

26 Mar 2019

The petitioner, a resident of Aurangabad, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive det...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's Preventive Detention Set Aside as Authorities Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Confirmatory Order Was Passed Without Independent Application of Mind.

8 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Ashokrao Uttamrao Pawar, father of the detenu Umesh @ Bunty s/o Ashok Pawar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the detention ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)