Search Results for "Article 116"

698 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 698 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant's claim for injunction based on title failed as courts below concurrently held that the suit property was a public road and not part of appellant's land.

The appellant filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 18th February 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Restrains Municipality from Locking and Sealing Premises for Property Tax Arrears of Owner. Tenant Cannot Be Compelled to Pay Owner's Tax Liability; No Statutory Power to Lock and Seal Under Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

The petitioner, V. Saminathan, filed a writ petition before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus to restrain the firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Tenant's Petition Restraining Municipality from Locking and Sealing Premises for Owner's Property Tax Arrears. No Statutory Power to Lock and Seal Under Section 116-A of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998; Tenant Not Liable for Owner's Tax.

The petitioner, V. Saminathan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 — Held That Notice Under Section 116(2) Is Not a Condition Precedent for Reassessment Under Section 116(1).

The petitioners, owners of a property in Baramati, challenged the reassessment of property tax by the Baramati Nagar Parishad. The property was origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case. Appeal Against Bangalore ITAT Order Lies Only Before Karnataka High Court Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune (the Revenue) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case. Appeal against Bangalore Bench of ITAT lies only before Karnataka High Court under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Bombay Police Act for Non-Application of Mind. Externment Order Set Aside as Authority Failed to Consider Acquittal in Most Cases and Non-Filing of Charge Sheet in Others.

The petitioner, Iqbaluddin Ziauddin Pirzade, challenged an externment order dated 19.01.2015 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jalgaon, under S...