Search Results for "Appropriate Government"

12375 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12375 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Union's Challenge to BMRCL Conduct Rules Due to Appropriate Government Dispute. Central and State Governments Argue Jurisdiction Over Metro Rail Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act.

This batch of writ petitions, filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, centered on the determination o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Teacher-Councilor in Municipal Election. Teacher in Government Aided School Does Not Hold Office of Profit Under Government for Disqualification Under Section 16 of Goa Municipalities Act, 1969.

The petitioner, Tukaram Kshemchandra Redkar, has been working as a primary teacher in a Government Aided School managed by Shree Susenashram Education...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses IPS Officer's Challenge to Rejection of Voluntary Retirement. Central Government's Decision to Reject Voluntary Retirement Upheld as Disciplinary Proceedings Were Contemplated and Petitioner Was Not Clear from Vigilance Angle.

The petitioner, a 1997 batch IPS officer of Maharashtra Cadre, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 7th ...