Search Results for "Amenity TDR"

68 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Municipal Corporation to Follow 2013 Act for Land Acquisition When Owner Refuses TDR. Land Reserved for Public Purpose Under MRTP Act Cannot Be Acquired by Compelling TDR; Authority Must Initiate Acquisition Under 2013 Act if Owner Refuses TDR.

The petitioner, a Public Charitable Trust, owned land bearing CTS No.216(pt) and CTS No.190 in Village Mandapeshwar, Borivali, Mumbai. The land was re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Involving Parking Amenity Dispute Under Article 226. Court Finds That Alteration of Parking Amenity Raises Public Law Concerns Requiring Planning Authority to Regard Public Convenience and Safety.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated a writ petition filed by Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society against Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developers' Challenge to PMC's Differential Development Charges Policy. Held that imposing higher development charges on properties within 100 meters of DP road while exempting others violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, a group of developers and a real estate association, challenged the policy of the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) that imposed highe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Surrendered DP Road Land Despite No-Objection Condition. Transferable Development Rights cannot be denied merely because surrender was a condition of permission; entitlement arises from statutory scheme under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Nirmal Ujwal Credit Cooperative Society, challenged a communication dated 22.09.2014 from the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (Planning A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Development Rights Certificate for Recreation Ground Amenity Under Regulation 34 of DCR 1991. Owner entitled to TDR for construction upon developing and handing over reserved amenity free of cost.

The petitioners, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Petition to Acquire Land by Offering FSI/TDR Without Owner's Consent. Corporation Cannot Unilaterally Substitute Monetary Compensation with Development Rights Under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioner, Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation, a municipal corporation established under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Ac...