Search Results for "Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Municipal Corporation Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation. Notice under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 issued in 1994; suit filed in 2001 held time-barred as cause of action arose on notice date.

The appellant, Satish Dalichand Shah, claimed to be a monthly tenant of a shop premises in Mumbai. On 23rd May, 1994, the Municipal Corporation of Gre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition of Junior Scientific Assistants Seeking Higher Pay Scale Without Promotion. Higher pay scale of Rs. 2000-3200 linked to actual promotion to Senior Scientific Assistant, not automatic entitlement under Circular dated 13.05.2002.

The petitioners, eleven individuals appointed as Junior Scientific Assistants (JSA) with the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) between 1979 and 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Challenge to Property Tax Demands on Mobile Towers in Part. Conservancy Tax, Penalty, and Shasti on Illegal Constructions Quashed as Invalid Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act.

The petitioners, Chennai Network Infrastructure Ltd. and another, carry on business of providing infrastructure services including installation and ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Re-inclusion of Property in Development Plan After Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Municipal Corporation cannot re-reserve same property after statutory lapse of reservation.

The petitioner, M/s. Motiwala Land Agencies, owned a piece of land in Aurangabad which was reserved for a public purpose (garden) in the Development P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Directs Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation to Pay Arrears of Pay Difference to Employee in Permanency Benefits Case. Corporation Agrees to Pay Differential Amount as Per Rejoinder Affidavit, Failing Which Interest at 6% Per Annum Will Accrue.

The petitioner, Rakesh Mahendrakumar Shah, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Co...