Search Results for "Advertising Hoardings"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Interim Relief to Advertisement Agency in Arbitration Dispute Over Hoarding Construction Agreement. The court found a prima facie case and balance of convenience in favor of the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Adtrack Media LLP, an advertisement agency, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. The Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Denying Interim Protection Despite Registered Device Mark and Alleged Joint Use of the 'Kshetrapal' Mark.

The dispute centered on the use of the trademark 'Shree Kshetrapal' / 'Kshetrapal Construction' by two individuals in the construction business in Guj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Hoarding Site. The Court upheld the Collector's allotment of a hoarding site to Respondent No. 5 and the Minister's rejection of the Petitioner's review application, finding no illegality or violation of policy.

The Petitioner, Sanjiv Manmohan Gupta, carrying on business as M/s. Global Advertisers, challenged the order dated 20th August 2021 allotting a hoardi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Pioneer Publicity Corporation and Airport Authority of India. Dispute arises from unilateral reduction of hoarding size from 8,000 sq ft to 5,000 sq ft and failure to refund security deposit.

The applicant, Pioneer Publicity Corporation Pvt Ltd, was the successful tenderer for a contract with the Airport Authority of India (AAI) for display...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'LIVE IN' Mark Found Deceptively Similar to 'LIVE-IN'. Phonetic and visual similarity between marks leads to injunction under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Federal Brands Ltd., filed a trademark infringement and passing off suit against Levi Strauss India Pvt. Ltd. seeking a temporary injun...