Search Results for "Additional Tahsildar office"

860 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 860 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Sarpanch Reservation Process in Gram Panchayats Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. District-Level Reservation Overrides Tahsildar's Preliminary Decision; No Vested Right for Candidates Based on Earlier Unfinalized Reservation.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by two women elected members of Matond Gram Panchayat from the open category, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Committed Development Under UDCPR Regulation 5.1.3. Development Permission Granted Before Draft Regional Plan Publication Protects Builder's Right to Occupation Certificate Despite Subsequent Agricultural Reservation in Regional Plan.

The petitioner, Raj Realtors, a partnership firm, constructed ten buildings comprising 446 residential and 20 commercial units on land at Mouje Pashan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Quashing Suspension of Tahsildar. Government Resolution Waiving Penalty for Illegal Mining Was Stayed at Time of Tribunal Order, But Suspension Set Aside on Grounds of No Prima Facie Case.

The case involves two writ petitions challenging a common judgment and order dated 24-11-2023 of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal in Original A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Patta for Government Poramboke Land — Quashes Tahsildar's Order for Non-Consideration of Representation. Land Exchange for Public Purpose and Long Possession Entitle Petitioner to Consideration of Patta Application Under Article 226.

The petitioner, Pappushan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.

The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Alleging Encroachment Based on Revenue Records. Petitioner's claim of encroachment on S.F.Nos.416 and 418/49 rejected as Tahsildar's counter stated no encroachment exists.

The petitioner, M.Ramadurai, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent, the District Collector of P...