High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Order in Land Dispute Involving Archak Family of Kolluru Mookambika Temple — Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that an order passed without notice to the persons in possession is violative of principles of natural justice and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, K N Parameshwara Adiga and Kalidasa Bhat, residents of Kolluru village and belonging to the Archak family of Sri Kolluru Mookambika temple, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 02.01.2012 passed by the Special Tahsildar, Byndooru, in proceedings No.ADM.CR.1/2011-12. The impugned order pertained to land bearing Sy. No.19/19 situated in Kolluru village, measuring 0.06 cents, which was listed at serial No.8 in the table annexed to the order. The petitioners contended that they had been residing in the said place from time immemorial, even prior to British rule, as they were allowed to stay near the temple for performing pooja of Goddess Sri Mookambika. The primary legal issue was whether the order passed without issuing any notice to the petitioners was sustainable. The court noted that the order was passed without notice to the petitioners, who were in possession of the land, and thus violated principles of natural justice. The court held that the order was liable to be quashed and remitted the matter to the Special Tahsildar for fresh consideration after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The writ petition was allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Natural Justice - Right to be Heard - Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Order passed by Special Tahsildar without notice to the petitioners, who were in possession of the land, is violative of principles of natural justice - Held that the order is liable to be quashed and matter remitted for fresh consideration after giving opportunity of hearing (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order passed by the Special Tahsildar without issuing notice to the petitioners is sustainable in law?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 02.01.2012 passed by the Special Tahsildar, Byndooru, in proceedings No.ADM.CR.1/2011-12 insofar as it pertains to land bearing Sy. No.19/19 is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Special Tahsildar for fresh consideration after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Quasi-judicial proceedings
  • Land revenue records
  • Karnataka Land Revenue Act
  • 1964
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (03) 15

Writ Petition No.3367/2018 (KLR-RES)

2019-03-25

S.N. Satyanarayana

M E Nagesh for petitioners, Venkatesh Dodderi for respondents

K N Parameshwara Adiga and Kalidasa Bhat

The Tahsildar, Byndoor, Kundapura Taluk, Udupi District and The Deputy Commissioner, Rajathadri, Manipal, Udupi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Special Tahsildar regarding land revenue records

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 02.01.2012 passed by Special Tahsildar, Byndooru, insofar as it pertains to land bearing Sy. No.19/19

Filing Reason

Order passed without notice to petitioners who are in possession of the land

Previous Decisions

Order dated 02.01.2012 by Special Tahsildar in proceedings No.ADM.CR.1/2011-12

Issues

Whether the order passed by the Special Tahsildar without issuing notice to the petitioners is sustainable in law?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners contended that they are residents of Kolluru village and belong to Archak family of Sri Kolluru Mookambika temple, residing there from time immemorial. They argued that the impugned order was passed without any notice to them, violating principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

An order passed without notice to the persons in possession of the land is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are impugning the order dated 02.01.2012 vide Annexure ‘D’ to the petition passed by Special Tahasildar, Byndooru, in proceedings No.ADM.CR.1/2011-12 insofar as it pertains to land bearing Sy. No.19/19 situate in Kolluru village. The order impugned is passed without notice to the petitioners, who are said to be in possession of the land in question. Therefore, the same is not sustainable.

Procedural History

The Special Tahsildar, Byndooru, passed an order on 02.01.2012 in proceedings No.ADM.CR.1/2011-12. The petitioners filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the order. The High Court allowed the petition on 25.03.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Order in Land Dispute Involving Archak Family of Kolluru Mookambika Temple — Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that an order passed without notice to the persons in possessio...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Pedestrian in Motor Accident Claim. Tribunal's assessment of functional disability and future loss of income revised; compensation increased from Rs.4,05,500/- to Rs.6,42,700/-.