Search Results for "120 Days Limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "120 Days Limitation"

539 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 539 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

1 Jan 1970

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows NHAI's Appeal in Arbitration Delay Condonation Case — Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended Beyond 120 Days. The Court held that the proviso to Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is a complete code and the maximum period for filing a Section 34 application is 120 days from the date of receipt of the award or order, and no court has the power to condone delay beyond that period.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which ha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revision Condonation Delay in Himachal Pradesh VAT Act — Section 5 Limitation Act Applicable. High Court's revisional power under Section 48 of the HP VAT Act, 2005 includes power to condone delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 as Section 29(2) applies unless expressly excluded.

25 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Himachal Pradesh High Court's judgment dated 19.11.2018, which refused to condone delay in filing rev...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Admission of Liability in Written Statement Constitutes Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963. Suit for Recovery of Money Based on Supply of Goods Held Not Time-Barred Due to Defendant's Admission.

22 Oct 2021

The case involves a suit for recovery of money filed by M/s. Jindal Steels, a partnership firm (plaintiff), against Trident Architectural Aluminium Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Port Trust's Claim for Demurrage Prior to Confiscation Order: Suit Not Barred by Limitation. Right to Sue Accrues on Date of Confiscation Under Article 113, Limitation Act, 1963, and Not at Expiry of Free Days Despite Board's Powers Under Sections 61 and 62 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

15 Dec 2006

This is a suit filed by the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay against an importer for recovery of port trust charges (wharfage and demurrage) ac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Arbitration Petition Under Section 14 of Limitation Act. Time spent in earlier proceeding before court lacking jurisdiction excluded, delay of 144 days condoned.

12 Mar 2019

The applicant, M/s Globe Capital Market Ltd., filed a notice of motion in an arbitration petition seeking condonation of delay of 144 days in filing t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Against Gratuity Authority Orders Due to Statutory Time Bar. Appellate Authority Correctly Rejected Appeal Filed Beyond 120-Day Maximum Period Under Section 7(7) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as Special Statute Impliedly Excludes Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Mar 2026

The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi Bench heard a writ petition filed by the Executive Engineer and Managing Director of KNNL against orders pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Filing Section 34 Petition Under Arbitration Act — Limitation Period Computed Strictly Under Section 34(3) Read With Section 33(6). The court held that the delay beyond the 30-day extension period cannot be condoned, and the District Court's order was upheld.

23 Apr 2015

The appellant, M/s. S.R. Thermocole (EPS) Packaging Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Insolvency Appeal Due to Statutory Limitation Bar. The Court upheld the NCLAT's refusal to condone a 44-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, ruling that Article 142 of the Constitution cannot override specific statutory time limits.

14 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from insolvency proceedings initiated by the State Bank of India against Dunar Foods Limited under Section 7 of the Insolvency and B...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)