Search Results for "employee grievance"

1653 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1653 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.

The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010822332025_1

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Medically Invalidated CRPF Constable in Service Law Case — Employer Must Consider Alternative Employment Before Medical Invalidation. Medical Invalidation Without Exploring Alternative Post Violates Right to Livelihood Under Article 21 of Constitution.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India and CRPF officers against the High Court of Himachal Pradesh's order reinstating a constable (driver...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Election of Director in Co-operative Society Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Non-Member of Society Cannot Challenge Election Under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Ms. Roopa M, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 13.04.2023 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by Union of India Challenging Central Administrative Tribunal Orders in Service Matters. The Petitions Involve Defence Civilian Employees and Orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The provided judgment text is limited to the case title and party names. No substantive content regarding the facts, issues, arguments, or decision of...