Karnataka High Court Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by Union of India Challenging Central Administrative Tribunal Orders in Service Matters. The Petitions Involve Defence Civilian Employees and Orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The provided judgment text is limited to the case title and party names. No substantive content regarding the facts, issues, arguments, or decision of the court is available. The case pertains to writ petitions filed by the Union of India and other authorities against several individuals who appear to be defence civilian employees. The case numbers indicate that these are service matters arising from orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). The Bench consists of Justice Jayant Patel and Justice Sreenivas Harish Kumar. The petitioners are represented by CGC Shashikantha C. No further details are discernible from the provided text.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010124162016_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (11) 47

W.P. No. 51098/2016 c/w W.P. Nos. 54922-55037/2016, 53273/2016, 54819-54917/2016, 53277/2016, 54817-818/2016, 53575-53577/2016 (S-CAT)

2016-11-16

Jayant Patel, Sreenivas Harish Kumar

Shashikantha C, CGC (for Petitioners); Not mentioned (for Respondents)

Union of India & Others

N. Srinivasulu and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal in service matters concerning defence civilian employees

Previous Decisions

Orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal, details not mentioned

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by Union of India Challenging Central Administrative Tribunal Orders in Service Matters. The Petitions Involve Defence Civilian Employees and Orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bride Burning Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were inconsistent and not corroborated by medical evidence or independent witnesses.