Search Results for "concurrent prosecution"

738 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 738 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Failure to Rebut Presumption. Appellant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as cheque was issued as security and loan transaction not reflected in income tax returns.

The appellant, Sri Dattatraya, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Sharanappa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes NCLT Approval and NCLAT Judgment in Bhushan Power CIRP, Remands for Fresh Resolution Plan. Approved Plan Set Aside Due to Inordinate Delay, Illegal Extension Clause, Waterfall Violation, and Non-Compliance with IBC Provisions Including Sections 30, 31, and 53.

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of civil appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) challenging the approval of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Passing of Award Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 11A of 1894 Act.

The matter involved a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by landowners whose agricultural lands in Mahajenaha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sub-Tenant's Petition in Rent Control Eviction Case. Concurrent findings of fact that sub-tenant was not in occupation prior to 1st February 1973, thus not entitled to protection under Section 15A of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947.

The present petition was filed by a sub-tenant, Baburao Laxman Kshatriya (deceased, represented by his legal heir Smt. Kesharbai Baburao Kshatriya), c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses LIC's Appeal on Stamp Duty for Insurance Policies in Rajasthan. State Has Legislative Competence Under Concurrent List to Collect Stamp Duty on Insurance Policies, But Relief Granted on Facts.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) against a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which upheld th...