Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Office Assistant"
6042 result(s) found
Found 6042 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Consent Award Under Section 11 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Remains Valid Despite Land Owner's Refusal to Accept Compensation, Precluding Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
17 Mar 2023The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for resettlement of Narmada Project oustees. The re...
- 345
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Final Report in Bio-Diesel Seizure Case — Essential Commodities Act Not Attracted. The court held that bio-diesel is not an essential commodity under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, nor a petroleum product under the Petroleum Act, 1934, and quashed proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.
8 Sep 2023The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.1203 of 2021 d...
- 94
High Court
High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench Adjudicates Multiple Land Acquisition Appeals and Cross Objections Filed by Acquiring Body and Landowners Against Reference Court Award. Enhancement of Compensation from Rs.63,363/- to Rs.39,20,400/- per Acre is Challenged by Railways While Landowners Seek Further Enhancement.
24 Sep 2020The judgment (as reported) is incomplete and lacks a final determination. It pertains to a batch of miscellaneous first appeals and cross objections f...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Non-Party — Order Directing Compensation to Complainants Set Aside as Petitioner Not Impleaded as Opposite Party. The Court Held That No Order Can Be Passed Against a Person Without Giving Them an Opportunity of Being Heard, and the Consumer Forum Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.
20 Dec 2018The petitioner, Govind Dewaji Chavan, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 27-12-2016 passed by the District Consumer Disput...
- 87
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...
- 89
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Missing Female Baby — No Illegal Detention Established. Court holds that habeas corpus is not maintainable when the alleged detenu is not in custody of respondents and the petitioner fails to prove illegal detention.
8 Jan 2018The petitioner, Smt. Shankramma Poojari, a fruit vendor, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute Over Sikh Gurudwara Society Membership. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellant failed to prove membership in Sachkhanda Huzuri Khalsa Diwan, Nanded, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
7 May 2010The appellant, Shersingh s/o Hirasingh Fauji, filed two second appeals against the judgment of the District Judge-2, Nanded, dated 03.10.2009, dismiss...
- 77
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order in Land Conversion Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Deputy Commissioner's order under Section 95 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 set aside for lack of notice and opportunity of hearing to petitioners.
22 Feb 2019The petitioners, Rudrappa and others, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of K...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Upholds Cancellation of Membership for Non-Payment of Premium. The Court held that the AGRC's concurrent findings of fact regarding non-payment of premium and lack of documentary evidence were not perverse or arbitrary, and no interference was warranted under Article 226 of the Constitution.
19 Jan 2024The petitioners, Gopal Dinkar Vanave and Shekhar Gopal Vanave, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...
- 36
