Search Results for "share purchase"

1678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court Holds That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property, and That the Trial Court Erred in Decreeing the Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) over agricultural land. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No Substantial Question of Law Found Under Section 100 CPC Regarding Will Validity and Adverse Possession.

The case involves a property dispute among family members. The original plaintiff, Indumati Anantrao Naik (since deceased and represented by legal rep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning land in Village...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Due to Lack of Written Arbitration Agreement. Section 11 Application Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails as Alleged Partnership Deed of 1975 Not Produced and No Arbitration Clause Established.

The applicant, Yashvant Chunilal Mody, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The Appellant, Chitali Bottling Limited, filed a Special Civil Suit No.95 of 2020 before the 19th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...