Search Results for "share control"

1529 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1529 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Termination by District Central Cooperative Bank, Holding It Not a State Under Article 12. Cooperative Bank Employee's Challenge to Dismissal Fails as DCC Bank Is Not an Instrumentality of the State and No Violation of Natural Justice Established.

The petitioner, Kiran Rangnath Kale, was employed as a Manager at the Beed District Central Cooperative Bank (respondent No. 3). He was initially appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI's Moratorium and Liquidation of CKP Co-operative Bank Ltd. — Petitioners' Deposits Not Covered by Deposit Insurance as Bank Was Under Moratorium Prior to Insurance Scheme Introduction.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by depositors of the CKP Co-operative Bank Ltd., which was placed under moratorium by the Res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Air Force School Not Being 'State' Under Article 12. Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Available Against Air Force School Managed by Non-Government Society Funded by Non-Public Funds.

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals challenging the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which held that the Air Force School, Bamrauli, is ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...