Search Results for "sale deed recital"

382 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 382 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when courts below have concurrently found that suit property is joint family property and plaintiff is entitled to share.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendants No.2 to 4 against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Latur, in Regul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial and first appellate court decrees regarding declaration of title and permanent injunction, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The case pertains to a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of the firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for interference under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case is a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents) against the origi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree of Permanent Injunction. The Court held that the First Appellate Court's failure to frame points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC vitiated its judgment.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (plaintiffs) and the respondents (defendants) concerning a suit for permanent injunction. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Development Dispute. Court Upholds Damages for Breach but Disallows Compound Interest.

The judgment arises from two arbitration appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common order dated 25th...