Search Results for "reopening assessment"

438 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Jurisdiction — Cash Withdrawal Without Evidence of Escapement of Income Cannot Justify Reopening Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Hardip Shipping Logistics Private Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 on 18.10.2018 declaring total income...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Demand Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Section 156 Notice Set Aside for Lack of Proper Consideration of Petitioner's Reply.

The petitioner, Zydus Infrastructure Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in development, operation and main...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Legality of Re-opening Assessment Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Court Examines Whether Proceedings Initiated Under Substituted Sections 147-151 After Finance Act Amendment Are Valid for Assessment Year 2013-14.

In this writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, the petitioner, an individual assessee, challenged the revenue's action of reopening his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment initiated beyond four years without establishing that assessee failed to fully and truly disclose all material facts is invalid.

The petitioner, Vodafone Idea Ltd., successor in interest of M/s Idea Cellular Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 2nd August 2019 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Prior Approval Under Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment for AY 2014-15 invalid as approval was granted by an officer lacking jurisdiction under Section 151(2).

The Petitioner, Svitzer Hazira Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, providing marine services, challenged a notice dated 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Joint Commissioner Had Jurisdiction to Invoke Suo Moto Revision Under Section 63-A. Purchases from Composition Dealers Not Deductible from Contract Receipts for Taxable Turnover.

The case involves revision petitions filed by M/S JMC Projects (India) Ltd. against the State of Karnataka under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value ...