Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Prior Approval Under Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment for AY 2014-15 invalid as approval was granted by an officer lacking jurisdiction under Section 151(2).

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Svitzer Hazira Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, providing marine services, challenged a notice dated 31/03/2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, reopening its assessment for Assessment Year 2014-15. The Petitioner also challenged the order dated 28/11/2019 disposing of its objections against the reopening and the notice dated 09/10/2019 under Sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act. The primary ground for challenge was the lack of prior approval under Section 151 of the Act. The court noted that the notice under Section 148 was issued after four years from the end of the relevant assessment year (AY 2014-15 ends on 31/03/2015, and notice was issued on 31/03/2019). Under Section 151(2), if a notice under Section 148 is issued after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, the approval must be obtained from the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner. However, in this case, the approval was granted by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-5(3), Mumbai, who is not the 'specified authority' under Section 151(2). The court held that the approval by the Joint Commissioner was invalid, rendering the notice under Section 148 and all subsequent proceedings void. The court allowed the petition, quashing the notice dated 31/03/2019, the order dated 28/11/2019, and the notice dated 09/10/2019.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reopening of Assessment - Section 148 read with Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Prior Approval - The Assessing Officer issued a notice under Section 148 to reopen assessment for AY 2014-15. The approval for reopening was granted by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-5(3), Mumbai, who was not the 'specified authority' under Section 151(2) as the notice was issued after four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The court held that the approval must be granted by the 'specified authority' as defined in Section 151(2), i.e., the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, and not by the Joint Commissioner. Consequently, the notice and all subsequent proceedings were quashed. (Paras 6-10)

B) Income Tax - Reopening of Assessment - Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Specified Authority - The court interpreted Section 151(2) to mean that if a notice under Section 148 is issued after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, the approval must be obtained from the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner. In this case, the assessment year was 2014-15, and the notice was issued on 31/03/2019, which is beyond four years. Therefore, the approval by the Joint Commissioner was invalid. (Paras 6-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notice dated 31/03/2019 reopening assessment for AY 2014-15 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the subsequent proceedings, are invalid for lack of prior approval under Section 151 of the Act?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and quashed the notice dated 31/03/2019 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the order dated 28/11/2019 disposing of the objections, and the notice dated 09/10/2019 under Sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act.

Law Points

  • Reopening of assessment
  • Prior approval under Section 151
  • Jurisdiction of approving authority
  • Section 148 notice
  • Section 143(2) notice
  • Section 142(1) notice
  • Income Tax Act
  • 1961
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (12) 32

Writ Petition No. 3554 of 2019

2021-12-21

K. R. Shriram, Amit B. Borkar

2021:BHC-OS:5662-DB

Mr. Nishant Thakkar a/w Mr. Hiten Chande i/b PDS Legal for Petitioner; Mr. Sham V. Walve a/w Mr. Pritish Chatterjee for Respondent Nos.1 & 2

Svitzer Hazira Pvt. Ltd.

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-5(3)(2), Mumbai; Joint / Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Range-5(3), Mumbai; The Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging reopening of assessment under Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of notice dated 31/03/2019 under Section 148, order dated 28/11/2019 disposing of objections, and notice dated 09/10/2019 under Sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the reopening of assessment for AY 2014-15 on the ground that the prior approval under Section 151 of the Act was not obtained from the specified authority.

Issues

Whether the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, reopening assessment for AY 2014-15, is invalid for lack of prior approval under Section 151 of the Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the notice under Section 148 was issued after four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, and therefore, under Section 151(2), approval must be obtained from the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, but the approval was granted by the Joint Commissioner, which is invalid. Respondents argued that the approval was validly granted by the Joint Commissioner.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 151(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, if a notice under Section 148 is issued after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, the approval must be obtained from the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner. In this case, the approval was granted by the Joint Commissioner, who is not the specified authority under Section 151(2), rendering the notice and subsequent proceedings invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

Since we are disposing of the present petition only on the ground of lack of prior approval as contemplated under Section 151 of the Act, only those facts essential for adjudication of the said issue are stated hereinafter. The notice was uploaded at 2.40 p.m. on 31/03/2019 on the portal under the digital signature of Respondent No.1. The approval was granted by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-5(3), Mumbai, who is not the 'specified authority' under Section 151(2).

Procedural History

The Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notice dated 31/03/2019 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, reopening assessment for AY 2014-15, the order dated 28/11/2019 disposing of objections, and the notice dated 09/10/2019 under Sections 143(2) and 142(1). The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 21/12/2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 148, Section 151, Section 143(2), Section 142(1)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Re-examination of Complainant in NI Act Case Under Section 311 CrPC. The court held that re-examination to prove a document is permissible for just decision and does not prejudice the accused.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of Nomination of Board Member in BWSSB Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment under Section 3(3)(b) of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1964 cannot be withdrawn without affording opportun...