Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities. Award Directed Petitioner Company to Pay Net Amount After Allowing Counter Claim, Raising Issues of Service of Counter Claim and Natural Justice.

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging in part an Arbitral Award dated 23rd Novemb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stevedoring Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award of damages for breach of contract and interest, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's findings.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing Arbitration Petition No. 18 of 2003 under Section 34 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appellant's Letters Patent Appeals in Land Dispute, Upholding Single Judge's Order. Delay Condonation Denied as Unexplained; Appeals Found Devoid of Merit on Substance.

The judgment pertains to two Letters Patent Appeals filed by Vasharambhai Sagharambhai Bharvad against a common judgment and order dated 16.10.2025 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Hotel Sale Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.1.88 crore with interest for breach of contract, rejecting grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Sahara Hospitality Limited (formerly Batra Hospitality Private Limited), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Land Sale Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Petition Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence and That Award Was Not Perverse.

The case involves an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment of the Principal Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Arbitral Award Setting Aside Penalties, Termination, and Blacklisting in Sewerage Treatment Plant Contract Dispute

The High Court of Bombay heard cross-petitions challenging an arbitral award dated 18 June 2020 in a dispute between Solapur Municipal Corporation and...