Search Results for "offence under Section 220"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "offence under Section 220"

378 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 378 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.

11 Jul 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Against Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout; Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Under BDA Act, 1976.

11 Jul 2014

Multiple writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Resolves Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for 'Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout'. The Petitioners Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Issued by Bangalore Development Authority.

11 Jul 2014

A large batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to BDA Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary Notification Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Final Notification Under BDA Act, 1976.

11 Jul 2014

This batch of writ petitions was filed by various land owners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition not...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Upon Challenge by Trade Associations. Court Holds That Constitutional Challenge Cannot Be Abstract and Requires Factual Foundation of Adverse Action, But Proceeds to Hear Merits for Recurring Issues.

16 Sep 2015

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of three writ petitions filed by trade associations—the Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business, M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Temple Committee Term Commencing from Date of Order in Religious Endowment Dispute. Term of Management Committee of Sri Mukambika Temple, Kolluru, to begin from date of Commissioner's order, not from date of assuming charge, under Section 28 of Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997.

20 Dec 2023

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an order dated 27.10.2020 passed b...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Multiple Second Appeals in Dispute Between Acharyas and Plaintiffs Over Mahanubhav Ashram – Suit Involves Questions of Religious Practice and Trust Management

1 Jan 1970

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Act Case Due to Arbitrary Stay Provision. The Third Proviso to Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Was Struck Down as It Automatically Vacated Stay Orders After 365 Days Without Considering Assessee's Responsibility for Delay, Violating Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

6 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed a batch of civil appeals concerning the constitutional validity of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) of the In...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)