Search Results for "minor's share"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "minor's share"

1092 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1092 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will and Codicil in Favor of Executors Despite Caveat by Son — Execution and Attestation Proved Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court held that the Will and Codicil were duly executed and attested, and the caveator's allegations of undue influence and lack of testamentary capacity were not substantiated.

11 Jun 2014

The plaintiffs, being three of the executors named in the last Will and Testament dated 16th June, 1999 and a Codicil dated 23rd July, 2001 of Sorabji...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Railway Board's Catering Licensing Policy — License Fee and Gross Sales Share Not Arbitrary. The policy requiring licensees to pay a share of gross sales is a valid contractual term and does not violate Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

8 Jan 2016

The petitioners, various catering associations and individual licensees, challenged the Railway Board's policy dated 1st April 2013 and subsequent cir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Purchasers Challenging Eviction Order in Tenancy Dispute — Purchasers Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Order Passed Against Tenant Before Their Purchase. The court held that the petitioners, who purchased the suit land after the eviction order under Section 14 read with Section 25(2) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, cannot challenge that order as they were not parties to the proceedings.

19 Jan 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed by three petitioners, who are purchasers of agricultural...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Reversed on Ground of Non-Examination of Attesting Witness to Will. The first appellate court's reversal of the trial court's decree was set aside as it failed to consider the mandatory requirement of examining an attesting witness to prove the Will under Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 read with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

1 Oct 2013

The appellant, H.M. Rudraradhya, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Exploitation of Minor Girls Under POCSO Act and IPC — Faith-Based Deception Used to Sexually Assault Six Girls. The court held that the testimony of child victims, coupled with the presumption under Section 29 of POCSO Act, was sufficient to sustain the conviction for aggravated sexual assault.

16 Jan 2024

The appellant, Mehandi Kasim Jenul Abidin Shaikh, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act for sexually assaulting six minor girls aged ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds trial and appellate court decrees dismissing suit for declaration and injunction, finding no substantial question of law.

18 Dec 2025

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) arises from a suit for declaration and injunction filed...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Reverses Appellate Court's Dismissal and Restores Trial Court's Decree. Held that the appellate court erred in reversing the trial court's judgment without properly considering the evidence regarding possession and title.

5 Jan 2026

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed a suit for bare injunction in O.S.No.52 of 2008 before the District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur, seeking to restrain ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Over Suit Property; Courts Below Correctly Held That Plaintiff Was Not in Possession and That Defendants Were in Possession.

1 Oct 2013

The appellant, Nagarathnamma, was the plaintiff in a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Based on Adverse Possession Fails as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Hostile Possession for Statutory Period.

22 Jun 2017

The case pertains to a second appeal filed by the first defendant in O.S.No.17/1992 before the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Chintamani, challenging the concur...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)