Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

691 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 691 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs State to Complete Land Acquisition and Pay Compensation After 30-Year Delay -- Systemic Negligence in Land Acquisition Process Addressed in Writ Petition

The petitioners, landowners from Beed district, filed a writ petition after their lands were taken into possession in 1996 for a village tank project,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Landowners' Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Change Master Plan Road Alignment. Change of Alignment of 30-Meter Road Not Permissible in Interregnum Under Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Decision of Planning Authority Upheld.

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by two landowners, K. Gopalagowda and R. Ravichandar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Has No Locus to Claim Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. Possession Taken, Compensation Not Paid Does Not Result in Lapse as Twin Conditions Must Be Satisfied.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had declared t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Petition Declaring Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 for Non-Taking of Possession and Non-Payment of Compensation. Acquisition Initiated in 1965 Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Deemed Lapsed as Neither Possession Taken Nor Compensation Paid.

The petitioner, Joaquim Victor Fernandes, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings for his plot No. 34 admeasuring...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...