Search Results for "collusive"

348 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 348 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit properties, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Basavaraj Basavanneppa Pattan, filed six second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Review of Concurrent Findings in Forest Land Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. High Court Exceeded Review Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Concurrent Findings of Fact.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Telangana against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, which had revi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's title as sole heir was established and the defendant failed to prove adverse possession.

The second appeal arose from a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Zilla Parishad Councillor for Having Three Children Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Family Planning Policy Enforced Strictly to Curb Population Explosion.

The petitioner, Gautam s/o Rama Latke, was elected as a Councillor from the Anala (30) Constituency of Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. He was aggrieved by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010480352008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Village Panchayat Election Due to Three Children. Section 14(j-1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Bar Not Applicable as Petitioner Had Only Two Children Born After Specified Date.

The petitioner, Meena Babu Darade, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her nomination for the election of the village panchayat of Nafa...