Search Results for "Share"

5582 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5582 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — Dispute Over Agricultural Land Inheritance and Partition. Court Held That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Remedy Lies Before Civil Court.

The petitioners, eleven individuals from the Jarande family, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a mutation entry (Entry No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Delay of 13 Years Not Condoned as Applicants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (applicants) against an order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Khed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below concurrently found plaintiff not to be the legally wedded wife of deceased.

The case involves a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2004 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeals Against Vacation of Temporary Injunction in Property Partition Dispute. Grandchildren Seek Share in Ancestral Properties Alleging Attempts to Alienate Suit Properties.

The matter pertains to two appeals filed against the order of the XIV Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, dated 26 September 2019, in Original Sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...