Search Results for "Section 16(2) jurisdiction challenge"

608 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 608 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Refuses to Interfere in Municipal Election Process Amid Challenge to Reservation and Voter List. Pre-Election Judicial Intervention Not Permissible Under Article 243-ZG; Petitioners Allowed to Question Election Outcome After Declaration of Results.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, considered three writ petitions challenging notifications regarding reservation of posts for Mayor and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation for Local Body Elections. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Seek to Quash State Notifications Alleging Arbitrary Reservation.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a large batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010137812018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010124482018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Valuation of Physician's Free Samples Under Central Excise Act. Free samples of medicines are excisable goods and must be valued under Rule 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 based on price of comparable goods sold in the market.

The petitioners, Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association and M/s. Emil Pharmaceuticals Industries Pvt. Ltd., challenged Circular No. 813 dated 25/4/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Application to File Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge Order Rejecting Recall of Settlement. Settlement between Company and Union Held Binding on Workmen Despite Non-Signatory Status.

The case involves two civil applications filed by individual employees of M/s Jaysynth Anthraquinone Ltd. and M/s Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd. seeking leave ...