Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Anna Mahadu Arote, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Fakira s/o Magdu Kannake, a Head Constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Asaram Dhansing Umre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad, in Special Case No.5 of 1998 under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) and Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was a stock witness and evidence lacked corroboration.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant Gopal Gadhave (accused no.1) was convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jivandhar S/o Govindrao Katke, was convicted by the Special Judge (A.C.), Aurangabad in Special Case No. 6/1994 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Vasant Domaji Likhar, was convicted by the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for offences under Sections 7 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 161 IPC.

The appellant, Sharad s/o Namdeorao Shirbhate, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amravati in Special Case No.7 of 1988 for offences under...