High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Company in CBI Case — Company Cannot Be Prosecuted Alone Without Directors for Criminal Offences. The court held that a company, being a juristic entity, cannot be prosecuted for criminal offences requiring mens rea without impleading its directors or officers.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sanofi India Limited (formerly Aventis Pharma Limited), a public limited company, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of proceedings in Special C.C. No. 226/2017 pending before the XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bengaluru (CCH-47). The petition also challenged the impugned order dated 01.06.2017. The core legal issue was whether a company alone can be prosecuted for criminal offences without its directors. The petitioner argued that a company, being a juristic entity, cannot have mens rea and cannot be prosecuted for criminal offences without impleading the natural persons who are responsible for the acts. The respondent, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), opposed the petition. The court, after hearing arguments, held that a company cannot be prosecuted alone for criminal offences without its directors, as the company acts through its directors and officers, and the element of mens rea cannot be attributed to a company in isolation. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings in Special C.C. No. 226/2017.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Prosecution of Company - Vicarious Liability - Whether a company alone can be prosecuted for criminal offences without its directors - The court considered the question whether a company, being a juristic entity, can be prosecuted for criminal offences requiring mens rea without impleading its directors or officers - Held that a company cannot be prosecuted alone for criminal offences without its directors, as the company acts through its directors and officers, and the element of mens rea cannot be attributed to a company in isolation (Paras 2, 5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a company alone can be prosecuted for commission of criminal offences without its directors?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The proceedings in Special C.C. No. 226/2017 pending before the XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bengaluru (CCH-47) are quashed.

Law Points

  • Criminal liability of company
  • vicarious liability
  • mens rea
  • prosecution without directors
  • quashing of proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (02) 3

Criminal Petition No. 4280/2018

2019-02-15

P.S. Dinesh Kumar

Shri. Uday Holla, Senior Advocate for Shri. Anind Thomas, Advocate for petitioner; Shri. P. Prasanna Kumar, Advocate for respondent

Sanofi India Limited (formerly Aventis Pharma Limited)

State represented by Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti-Corruption Branch, Bengaluru

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings in a CBI case.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of entire proceedings in Special C.C. No. 226/2017 and the impugned order dated 01.06.2017.

Filing Reason

The petitioner company was being prosecuted alone without its directors for criminal offences.

Issues

Whether a company alone can be prosecuted for commission of criminal offences without its directors?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that a company cannot be prosecuted alone for criminal offences without its directors as it lacks mens rea. Respondent CBI opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

A company, being a juristic entity, cannot be prosecuted for criminal offences requiring mens rea without impleading its directors or officers, as the company acts through natural persons.

Judgment Excerpts

The question for consideration in this petition is, ‘whether a Company alone can be prosecuted for commission of criminal offences without its directors?’

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka seeking quashing of proceedings in Special C.C. No. 226/2017. The petition was heard and reserved for orders on 13.11.2018, and the order was pronounced on 15.02.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Company in CBI Case — Company Cannot Be Prosecuted Alone Without Directors for Criminal Offences. The court held that a company, being a juristic entity, cannot be prosecuted for criminal offences...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Murder of Daughter Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.