Search Results for "General Provident Fund Rules"

300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Greater Mumbai Milk Scheme Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Order in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Industrial Court's jurisdiction to grant interim relief under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 upheld.

The present Writ Petition was filed by the Petitioners, the General Manager of the Greater Mumbai Milk Scheme and another, challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to University Employee with 33 Years of Service Despite Temporary Appointments and Breaks. Continuous Service Under Rule 33 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Includes Temporary Service Followed by Confirmation.

The petitioner, a chemistry teacher, served Savitribai Phule Pune University from 1993 until her retirement on 30 April 2016, completing over 33 years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.

The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Housing Society Against ESI Corporation — Society Not a 'Shop' Under ESI Act Notification. Principles of Natural Justice Not Applicable to Notification Under Section 1(5) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The appellant, Vidarbha Premier Co-operative Housing Society, filed an appeal against the order of the Employees' State Insurance Court, Nagpur, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Employees Against Air India for Failure to Accept Resignations. Employer Cannot Refuse Resignation or Force Employee to Continue Service Under Air India Certified Standing Orders.

The petitioners were employees of Air India Limited (respondent no.2) whose services were transferred to Air India Engineering Services Limited (respo...