Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Housing Society Against ESI Corporation — Society Not a 'Shop' Under ESI Act Notification. Principles of Natural Justice Not Applicable to Notification Under Section 1(5) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Vidarbha Premier Co-operative Housing Society, filed an appeal against the order of the Employees' State Insurance Court, Nagpur, which dismissed its application under Section 77(1) read with Section 75(g) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, and Rule 13 of the Bombay Employees' Insurance Rules, 1959. The society's main activities were extending loans to members for acquiring, constructing, or repairing residential houses on a no-profit-no-loss basis, and constructing flats through contractors for allotment to members. The ESI Corporation sought to cover the society under the Act, contending that it was a 'shop' under Clause 3(iii) of the Schedule to the notification dated 19/11/1976 issued under Section 1(5) of the Act. The High Court framed two substantial questions of law: whether the society could be considered a 'shop' under the notification, and whether principles of natural justice could be invoked regarding the applicability of the notification. The Court held that the society's activities were not commercial in nature and did not involve the sale of goods or services to its members, and therefore it did not fall within the definition of a 'shop' under the notification. The Court also held that the notification under Section 1(5) is a legislative act, and principles of natural justice are not applicable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the order of the ESI Court was set aside.

Headnote

A) Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Definition of 'Shop' - Section 1(5) - Notification dated 19/11/1976 - Whether a housing society extending loans to members for construction of houses and constructing flats through contractors can be considered a 'shop' - Held that the society's activities are not commercial and do not involve sale of goods or services to members, thus not a 'shop' under the notification (Paras 03-05).

B) Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Section 1(5) - Notification - Principles of Natural Justice - Whether principles of natural justice can be invoked in applicability of notification issued under Section 1(5) - Held that the notification is a legislative act and principles of natural justice are not attracted (Para 03).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant society can be said to be a 'shop' covered under Clause 3(iii) of the Schedule to the notification dated 19/11/1976 and in terms of Section 1(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; and whether principles of natural justice can be invoked in a case of applicability of notification issued under Section 1(5) of the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The order dated 19/08/2005 passed by the ESI Court, Nagpur in E.S.I. Case No.5/1992 is set aside. The appellant society is not covered under the ESI Act as a 'shop' under the notification dated 19/11/1976.

Law Points

  • Definition of 'shop' under ESI Act
  • Applicability of notification under Section 1(5)
  • Principles of natural justice in statutory notifications
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (09) 223

First Appeal No.35 of 2006

2017-09-21

Kum. Indira Jain, J.

Shri A.M. Ghare for the Appellant, Mrs. B.P. Maldhure for the Respondent

The Vidarbha Premier Co-operative Housing Society Limited

The Joint Regional Director, Sub-Regional Office, Employees State Insurance Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of ESI Court dismissing application under Section 77(1) read with Section 75(g) of ESI Act.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the order of ESI Court and declare that the society is not covered under the ESI Act.

Filing Reason

The ESI Corporation sought to cover the appellant society under the ESI Act as a 'shop' under notification dated 19/11/1976.

Previous Decisions

ESI Court dismissed the application of the society in E.S.I. Case No.5/1992 on 19/08/2005.

Issues

Whether the appellant society can be said to be a 'shop' covered under Clause 3(iii) of the Schedule to the notification dated 19/11/1976 and in terms of Section 1(5) of the ESI Act, 1948? Whether principles of natural justice can be invoked in a case of applicability of notification issued under Section 1(5) of the ESI Act, 1948?

Ratio Decidendi

A housing society whose main activities are extending loans to members for construction of houses and constructing flats through contractors on a no-profit-no-loss basis does not fall within the definition of a 'shop' under Clause 3(iii) of the Schedule to the notification dated 19/11/1976 issued under Section 1(5) of the ESI Act, as its activities are not commercial and do not involve sale of goods or services. Principles of natural justice are not applicable to the issuance of a notification under Section 1(5) as it is a legislative act.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the appellant Society can be said to be a shop covered under the Clause 3(iii) of the Schedule to the notification dated 19/11/1976 and in terms of the provisions of Section 1(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 ? Whether principles of natural justice can be invoked in a case of applicability of notification issued under Section 1(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 ?

Procedural History

The appellant society filed an application under Section 77(1) read with Section 75(g) of the ESI Act before the ESI Court, Nagpur, which was dismissed on 19/08/2005. The society then filed the present appeal before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948: 1(5), 75(g), 77(1)
  • Bombay Employees' Insurance Rules, 1959: 13
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Housing Society Against ESI Corporation — Society Not a 'Shop' Under ESI Act Notification. Principles of Natural Justice Not Applicable to Notification Under Section 1(5) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Last Seen Theory Fails as Chain of Circumstances Incomplete. The court held that inconsistent evidence of last seen together and lack of motive cannot sustain convictio...