Search Results for "Departmental Dues"

279 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 279 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Filed by Builder Challenging Sealing of Property Under Enemy Property Act, 1968. Court Examines Legality of Order Passed by Deputy Secretary and Custodian After Earlier Withdrawal of Enemy Property Proceedings.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged as builder and developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Defamation Case Against Newspaper Publisher and Editor for Reporting FIR — Reporting of Police Press Release Constitutes Fair Comment and Substantial Truth Under Exception 1 to Section 499 IPC.

The petitioners, Manish Karapurkar (Publisher) and K. R. Sreenivas (Editor) of The Times of India, Goa Edition, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Editor-in-Chief in Abetment to Suicide Case — High Court Erred in Declining Bail Without Prima Facie Evaluation of FIR. Non-Payment of Dues Alone Does Not Constitute Abetment to Suicide Under Section 306 IPC.

The appellant, Arnab Manoranjan Goswami, Editor-in-Chief of Republic TV, was arrested on 4 November 2020 in connection with FIR No. 59 of 2018 registe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Charge-Sheet Issued Under Rule 14 CCS (CCA) Rules Two Days Before Retirement. Department's 13-year delay in initiating proceedings and subsequent acquittal in criminal case on same facts raised questions of law.

The petitioner, a member of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) recruited in 1979, was working as Additional Commissioner of Custo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Excess Salary from Retired Employee; Directs Pension Refixation and Payment of Benefits with Interest. Recovery impermissible as excess payment made for over five years and employee belongs to Class III, applying principles from State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The petitioner, Gendlal Dharkar, was initially appointed as a Tracer in Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran on 27/09/1991. Over the years, he received a ti...