Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

550 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 550 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in BAMS Doctors' Pay Parity Case — Tikku Committee Recommendations Not Applicable to Ayurvedic Practitioners. BAMS degree holders cannot claim parity with MBBS doctors under the Tikku Pay Commission as the Committee's scope was limited to allopathic service doctors.

The civil appeals arose from a common order of the Gujarat High Court Division Bench which confirmed a Single Judge's decision that respondents holdin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Interprets Prospective vs. Retrospective Operation of Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act in Second Appeals. Court Examines Coparcenary Rights of Daughters Born Before and After 2005 Amendment and Whether Division Bench Decision Is Per Incuriam.

This matter came before a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court upon a reference by a learned Single Judge (R.G. Ketkar, J.) who doubted the correctness...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Officials in Land Revenue Act Case — No Prima Facie Case for Abetment of Misappropriation. Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 requires specific allegations of abetment; mere official duty performance does not attract criminal liability.

The judgment concerns four criminal petitions and a writ petition filed by government officials seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.18/2014 registered...