Search Results for "plaintiff's assertion"

795 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 795 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Specific Performance Case — Buyer's Readiness and Williness Established. Time Held Not of Essence Due to Seller's Conduct in Accepting Delayed Payments and Continuing Negotiations.

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale of immovable property dated 20th January 2005 between the sellers (appellants in CA 3015/2013) and the bu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds lower courts' decree for partition and separate possession based on evidence of joint family property and plaintiff's share.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the defendants (appellants) against the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Declaration and Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Substantial Question of Law Must Arise for Interference in Second Appeal; Mere Appreciation of Evidence Not Sufficient.

The appellants, who were defendants 3 and 4 in the original suit O.S.No.39/2003, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Execution Proceedings - Limited Inquiry Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Conduct Full-Fledged Trial When Obstruction is Ex Facie Baseless; Summary Rejection Permissible.

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of inquiry to be conducted by an Executing Court under Order 21 Rule 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 190...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Fact. The Court held that no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC as the findings of the courts below were based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff...