Search Results for "hostile panch witness"

1332 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1332 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicts in Murder and Robbery Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Stolen Articles and Last Seen Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302, 395, 397 IPC.

The appellants, Raju Murges Subramanyam and Nicholas @ Tambi Mhanu Babu, were convicted by the Sessions Court at Thane for offences punishable under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC — Conviction Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(f) Challenged

This appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 363, 366A and 376(2)(f) of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Confirmation of Death Sentence and Criminal Appeals in Murder of Medical Officer. The court decides to first adjudicate the appeals against conviction before considering confirmation under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The case arises from the disappearance and murder of Dr. Vijaya Chaudhari, a Medical Officer at Civil Hospital, Jalgaon, on 12 March 2012. Her husband...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeals in Gang Rape Case; Convicts Challenge Conviction and State Seeks Enhancement of Sentence. Accused Were Convicted Under Sections 376(2)(g) and 366 IPC for Gang Rape of Two Minor Girls and Sentenced to 10 Years Rigorous Imprisonment.

Criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 121 of 1994 were taken up by the High Court of Judica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mahalingappa, a retired Junior Engineer of KPTCL, was convicted by the Special Judge and Principal Sessions Judge, Bidar, in Special Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Deputy Commissioner of Excise in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside due to unreliable trap witnesses and lack of corroboration.

The appellant, Shivananda Bankolli, was the Deputy Commissioner of Excise at Mysore. He was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge & Special Judge,...