Search Results for "guardian transfer"

503 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 503 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, Bapu Ladkat, Suresh Supekar, and Devidas Bhople, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove title and possession, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sub Judge, Chengalpattu, in A.S. No.12 of 2001, which modified t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Not Proved and Time Not Essence. Plaintiff failed to establish execution of agreement for sale and readiness and willingness to perform, leading to dismissal of suit for specific performance.

The appellant, Shaikh Hidayat, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of property admeasuring about 11920 sq. mtrs. at Borda, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Co-owner in possession cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners without clear ouster; suit for partition not barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The present regular second appeal arises out of a partition suit originally filed as O.S. No. 9/1993 on the file of the Munsiff & JMFC, Koratagere. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Seeking Disqualification of Panchayat Member for Alleged Pecuniary Interest. Mere ownership of premises does not constitute pecuniary interest in resolutions granting permission to licensee or NOC to bank under Section 10(1)(j) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Vishal Shambu Volvoikar, the Sarpanch of Se-Old Goa Village Panchayat, filed a writ petition seeking disqualification of respondent No...