Search Results for "forcible sexual intercourse"

340 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 340 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Complainant Mother in POCSO Case — Acquittal of Accused Set Aside for Non-Examination of Material Witness. Trial Court's Failure to Summon the Victim's Father, a Key Witness, Rendered the Acquittal Unsustainable Under Section 372 CrPC.

The appellant, Smt. Rajavva, the mother of the victim, filed a criminal appeal under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 7½-Year-Old Mentally Challenged Girl. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery, and Medical Reports Established Guilt Beyond Doubt; Aggravating Factors Outweighed Mitigating Factors.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Manoj Pratap Singh, upholding his conviction and death sentence for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Delay in FIR and Consent Allegations. Court Held That Victim's Age (19 Years) and Delay in Filing Complaint Weakened Prosecution Case Under Sections 363, 307, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act.

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking regular bail in Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder of Mentally Challenged Woman Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Evidence and Conduct of Appellant Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Rohan Gurung, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of a mentally challenged woman, Poornima, on the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Discrepancies in Victim Statements and Young Age. Cousin Sister Alleged Sexual Assault but Court Found Inconsistencies in Her Statements and Possibility of Reformation of 20-Year-Old Accused.

The applicant, Ritik Suresh Millil, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in connec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Deception. Conviction under Section 417 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused made false promise with intent to deceive complainant.

The appellant, Shankar, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, in S.C. No. 78/2005 for the offence punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder of Minor. Conviction Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted Due to Lack of Aggravating Circumstances.

The appellant, Ravishankar @ Baba Vishwakarma, was convicted by the Trial Court for kidnapping, raping, and murdering a 13-year-old girl, and for dest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Acquittal of accused for rape and sexual assault upheld as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, original complainant, filed an appeal under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal of Accused for Offences Under Sections 363, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 12 of POCSO Act Upheld Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Karnataka, through Bharamasagara Police Station, filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C. against the judgment of acquittal d...