Search Results for "environmental notification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "environmental notification"

445 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 445 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Second Appeal in Land Acquisition, Enhances Compensation to Rs.3,00,000/- Per Acre Based on 10% Escalation. Interest Under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable Only From Date of Award, Following Supreme Court Precedent in Karigowda.

17 Feb 2016

The case arose from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Mugabasava village, Bailhongal taluk, Belgaum District, for the Malaprabha Reservoir Proj...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment in Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Jamma Malai Lands as Forest Land. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Conservator of Forests' Order Forfeiting Rights Under Section 82 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Earlier Judicial Decrees.

17 Feb 2026

The writ petition challenged the order dated 16.12.2011 passed by the Conservator of Forests, Kodagu, declaring the petitioners' Jamma Malai lands as ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Construction Approval Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not owners of the suit property and approached the court after substantial delay.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by legal heirs of the original petitioner, Mr. Limo Cortez, challenging the construction approval granted by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against State's Allotment of Surplus Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Right After Repeal. Land vested in the State under Sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, prior to its repeal, remains with the State and cannot revert merely because the Act was subsequently repealed.

27 Oct 2016

The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Chhaganlal Khimji and Co. L...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stop Work Notice Issued by Pune Municipal Corporation Based on Proposed Prison Construction — Petitioner's Project Found Beyond 150 Meters from Prison Perimeter Wall, No Legal Basis for Restriction. The court held that rules under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894, do not regulate construction beyond the perimeter walls of a Central Prison, and that property rights under Article 300A of the Constitution cannot be interfered with based on future proposals without legal backing.

27 Aug 2024

The Petitioner, Fortune Developers and Infrastructure, owned a portion of property surveyed under No.154 at Yerawada, Pune, and had already constructe...

High Court

KAHC010480352008_1

10 Aug 2018

...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)