Search Results for "endorsement quashing"

469 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 469 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act stands unless rebutted by accused; failure to rebut leads to conviction.

The appellant, Sri B.R. Anand, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of acqui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Allows Writ Petition of Mutt Against Police Coercion — Police Directed Not to Interfere Without Judicial Order. Police Action of Coercing Religious Institution to Hand Over Brundavana Keys Held Illegal Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Uttaradi Mutt represented by its Peethadhipathi Sri Satyatma Teertha Swamiji, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Allows Writ Petition of Mutt Against Police Coercion — Police Directed Not to Interfere Without Judicial Order. Police Action of Coercing Mutt to Hand Over Brundavana Keys Held Illegal Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Uttaradi Mutt, represented by its Peethadhipathi Sri Satyatma Teertha Swamiji through its Chief Administrative Officer and GPA Holder ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for PL Encashment Despite Dismissal — Penalty of Dismissal Does Not Forfeit Privilege Leave Encashment Unless Service Rules Expressly Provide. Leave encashment is a vested right and not forfeited by dismissal in the absence of express rule.

The petitioner, G. Linganagouda, a former Assistant Manager of Pragathi Krishna Gramina Bank (now Karnataka Gramina Bank), was dismissed from service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Assessee's Appeal in Sales Tax Case — Revisional Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Penalty under Section 8(3)(b) of CST Act, 1956 Quashed as Assessee Was Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Driver of Vehicle.

The appellant, M/S Apotex Research Private Limited, an assessee under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed a Sales Tax Appeal under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Externment Order for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind — Petitioner Externed Under Section 56(1)(a) & (b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Based on Stale and Unrelated Crimes.

The petitioner, Bhushan Pohokar, challenged the externment order dated 13.05.2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-1, Amravati, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract by Municipal Corporation — Violation of Natural Justice and Contractual Obligations. Contract Termination Set Aside as Corporation Failed to Follow Contractual Dispute Resolution Mechanism and Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, BVG India Ltd., was awarded a contract by the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation in January 2016 for a period of five years for solid w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Declare Resignation Effective from Date of Tender in Standing Committee Membership Dispute. Resignation from Standing Committee takes effect from date of tender when accepted unconditionally, not from date of acceptance.

The petitioner, Deepak Umakant Mathpati, Chairman of the Standing Committee of Latur Municipal Corporation (LMC), filed a writ petition seeking a decl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...