Search Results for "compromise order"

1656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Warrant Against Education Officer in Execution Proceedings — State Officer Not Personally Liable for Decree Dues. Executing Court Cannot Direct Arrest or Recovery Against Government Officer Without Finding of Wilful Default Under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC.

The case arises from execution proceedings of a decree passed by the School Tribunal, Pune, in Appeal No. 104 of 1998, directing the reinstatement of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Regular Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Regarding Poojaraki Rights and Injunction. Appeal Filed by Defendants Against Concurrent Decrees of Lower Courts Partly Decreeing Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction.

The case concerned a dispute among the Bhavi family members, who are hereditary pujaris of the Prabhudev temple in Terdal, Jamakhandi. The plaintiffs,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Retired Employee Against State's Challenge to Lok Nyayalaya Order. The Court held that the Lok Nyayalaya's order directing pensionary benefits was binding and the State could not bypass it by filing a writ petition without exhausting alternative remedies.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court allowing a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra and the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Order of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Recovery Proceedings. The Case Involves Settlement and Auction of Property of Bradbury Mills Ltd., a Company in Liquidation, with Multiple Creditors and Guarantors.

The writ petition was filed by Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 22 August 2008, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Guardians and Wards Act Case — Custody of Minor Child Granted to Grandparents Based on Welfare Principle. Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 — Court held that welfare of the minor is paramount and biological father's right is not absolute.

The case involves a dispute over the custody of a minor child under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The appellants, the grandparents ...