Search Results for "Securitisation"

420 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 420 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 10533 OF 2023

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Detention Orders for Lack of Proper Adjudication. Detention orders under Section 129 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 quashed for violating natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was given and orders were unreasoned.

The petitioner, Bharat Co Operative Bank Mumbai Ltd, filed two writ petitions challenging detention orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRT's Power to Impound Unstamped Memorandum of Entry Under Bombay Stamp Act — Instrument Executed Outside State but Produced in Evidence Before Tribunal Properly Impounded.

The petitioner, M/s. WinnQuiz Company Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 16 August 2010. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Tribunal's Order in Co-operative Bank Loan Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 50% of Award Amount as Required Under Section 18 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

The petitioner, A. Shambandhan, borrowed a loan from the Mysore Merchants Co-operative Bank Limited (respondent No.1). He became a defaulter, leading ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging De-empanelment of Advocate by Bank of Baroda Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Issued with Premeditation Violates Right to Fair Hearing Under Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, a registered legal practitioner since 1980 and empanelled with the Bank of Baroda for over 30 years, was de-empanelled by a communicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Suit for Specific Performance Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Refusal to Execute Sale Deed in 2018.

The appellants, Sri K.T. Govinde Gowda and Smt. G. Anuradha, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challe...