Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

919 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 919 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Defective Translation of Grounds of Detention. Error in Translating CR Number in Marathi Version Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Sunil Bharat Govari, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Detention Order Under MPDA Act, 1981; Representations and Delay Issues Considered. Court Finds No Merit in Allegation of Non-Forwarding of Representation as Detenu's Son Voluntarily Took Back Copies, While Delay Explanation Was Noted.

The petitioner-detenu challenged his detention order dated 22.06.2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger — Detenu Acquitted in Multiple Excise Cases. Preventive detention under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 set aside as ordinary criminal law sufficient.

The petitioner, Gajji Veeresh, was detained under a preventive detention order dated 01.03.2014 passed by the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Bail Order Before Detaining Authority. The court held that the bail order was a vital document and its non-consideration vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, brother of the detinue, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detention order dated 17th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order in Goonda Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority's Reliance on Irrelevant Bail Order Without Similar Facts Vitiated Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Karishma Kapoor, wife of the detenu Sai Sudhahar @ Sudhahar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Reconsideration of Previously Adjudicated Offences and Failure to Distinguish Public Order from Law and Order Invalidates Preventive Detention.

The petitioner, Rajesh @ Dadu Eknath Nikumbh (Dhobi), challenged a preventive detention order dated 14.03.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalg...