Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows CBI Appeals in PC Act Cases: Consent Under Section 6 DSPE Act Not Required for Investigation of Central Government Employees; Notification Under Section 3 PC Act Not a Condition Precedent for Trial by Special Judge.

The Supreme Court of India heard two appeals filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a common judgment of the High Court of Andhra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unfair Trial. Sanctioning Authority Not Examined and Contents of Sanction Order Not Proved, Rendering Conviction Unsustainable Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Devidas Jagannath Joshi, was convicted by the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Acquits Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and independent witnesses turned hostile.

The case involves two appeals by accused police officers (Ramaiah, Police Head Constable, and T.R. Hanumanthaiah, Police Sub-Inspector) against their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash Corruption Proceedings Based on Retrospective Application of Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Amendment requiring prior sanction for investigation not applicable to cases where investigation commenced before its enactment.

The petitioner, T.N. Bettaswamaiah, was facing trial before the Special Judge, Tumakuru, in Special C.C. No. 152/2013 for offences punishable under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Corruption Case — Discharge Granted Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Petitioner, a public servant, was entitled to discharge as the prosecution failed to obtain valid sanction for prosecution.

The petitioner, a public servant, was accused in a corruption case before the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He filed an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Sanction for prosecution is mandatory and without it, the accused cannot be tried.

The petitioner, an accused in Spl.C.C.No.266/2016 before the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, filed an application under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision Petitions Against Order Allowing Discharge Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Court Holds That Sanction for Prosecution Is Not Required at the Stage of Taking Cognizance Under Section 19 of the PC Act.

The State of Karnataka, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Udupi District, filed two criminal revision petitions under Sections 397 and 401 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unproven Demand. Sanctioning Authority's Lack of Competence and Failure to Prove Demand by Gesture Alone Lead to Acquittal Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case arose from a criminal appeal against the conviction of Shankar Babarao Mukkawar, a former Executive Engineer with the Maharashtra Jivan Pradh...