Search Results for "Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act"

504 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 504 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Public Interest Litigations in Road Development Contract Dispute. Reiterates Stringent Locus Standi Requirements Under Article 226 to Prevent Abuse of Process by Meddlesome Bystanders.

The Bombay High Court examined the maintainability of multiple public interest litigations and writ petitions concerning the Kolhapur Integrated Road ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026

The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assignee of Debt to Proceed Under SARFAESI Act Despite Company Being Under Liquidation. Assignee Steps into Shoes of Original Lender and Can Enforce Security Interest Under Section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Limited, is a company registered as a Reconstruction Company and Securitisation Company with the Reserve Bank of India u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...