High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "Export contract"
534 result(s) found
Found 534 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 55
High Court
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Goa Mineral Policy 2013 and Royalty Levy. Court holds that royalty is a tax under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the State Government has power to levy it.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by mining companies and individuals challenging the Goa Mineral Policy 2013 and the levy of royalt...
- 261
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Order Directing Grant of Amenity TDR for Garden Development. High Court Allowed Writ Petition Challenging BMC's Denial of TDR and Directed Grant of Additional Amenity TDR Under Section 126 of MRTP Act.
1 Jan 1970The dispute centers on the entitlement to additional amenity Transferable Development Rights (TDR) for a garden developed on land reserved for a publi...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 46
High Court
High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank Officials and BGR Energy Executives in Bank Guarantee Dispute -- No Criminal Intent Found in Commercial Transaction Under IPC Sections 420, 403, 406, 418, 425, 427 read with 34
23 Feb 2026The High Court quashed an FIR registered against bank officials and company executives alleging criminal offences in connection with bank guarantee tr...
- 704
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.
6 Aug 2018The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...
- 190
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Licensing Authorities for Erroneous Licence Leading to 20 Years of Litigation. Petitioner Firm Penalised for Lapses of Licensing Authorities; Court Grants Relief Based on Fair Admission by Respondents.
7 Apr 2006The petitioner, M/s. General Instruments Co., a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition in the Bomba...
- 205
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of Continuing Guarantee Against State Government — Limitation Bar Rejected as Guarantee Subsists Until Full Payment. Continuing Guarantee Clause 6 of Deed Dated 5th June 1982 Remains Operative Until All Moneys Paid, Hence Claim Not Barred by Limitation.
1 Feb 2005The petitioner, Maharashtra State Co-op. Bank Ltd., stood as guarantor for a loan advanced to Swami Vivekanand Kaku Tel Sahakari Karkhana Limited. The...
- 58
