Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948"

387 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 387 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Trust Land Exchange Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Oral Exchange Agreement from 1956 Not Proved; Possession Not Established; Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed.

6 Feb 2026

The appellant, Shree Nootan Kelavani Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

30 Jul 2013

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — Dispute Over Agricultural Land Inheritance and Partition. Court Held That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Remedy Lies Before Civil Court.

19 Dec 2023

The petitioners, eleven individuals from the Jarande family, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a mutation entry (Entry No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Civil Procedure Amendment Case Regarding Mortgage Redemption Suit. The court upheld the lower courts' orders allowing amendment of plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, holding that issues of limitation and res judicata should be decided at trial, not at the amendment stage.

14 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from a property in Ballia, where the plaintiffs claimed ownership of a shop and filed Suit No. 154 of 2009 for possession upon ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Tribunal Matter — Upholds Single Judge's Order Confirming Occupancy Rights. Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights to Respondent No.3 Under Section 48-A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 Upheld as Based on Proper Evidence and Not Vitiated by Fraud.

6 Mar 2017

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by the legal representatives of the original appellant, Hasansab Allasaheb Pendari, against the order of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on joint family property partition and limitation, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

20 Jul 2026

The petitioners, who were members of a joint family, challenged an arbitral award passed in a partition dispute. The award had been made by an arbitra...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit. Multiple Appellants Challenge Judgment in O.S. No. 1949/1980 Dismissing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession.

1 Mar 2013

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Reforms Tribunal Order in Land Grant Case — Petitioners' Father Was Granted Land Under Rule 43(5) of Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969, and the Land Was Not Granted Under the Land Reforms Act. The Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

7 Jan 2020

The petitioners, legal representatives of late D. Ramanatha Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeki...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Removing Land Entries in Victimization Case — Dual Stand by Government Authorities Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act and SC/ST Act Leads to Setting Aside of Impugned Order. The court held that the petitioner was victimized by the contradictory stands of the Assistant Commissioner under the Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, 1978 and the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and quashed the order directing removal of entries.

17 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Krishnappa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an order dated 10.11.2011 passed by ...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)