Search Results for "Bombay Rents Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act 1947"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Bombay Rents Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act 1947"

288 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 288 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Involving Sub-Lease Dispute — Holds That Lease Disputes Under Transfer of Property Act Are Arbitrable. The Court ruled that disputes arising from a sub-lease deed governed by the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 are arbitrable, and since the petitioner is a foreign national, the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

18 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Suresh Shah, a Kenyan national and habitual resident of Nairobi, Kenya, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trust's Eviction Petitions Against Tenants in Rent Control Dispute — Landlord's Bona Fide Need Not Established. The court held that the trust failed to prove its reasonable and bona fide requirement for the suit premises under Section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, as no evidence of any decision to use the premises was produced.

2 Dec 2015

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by Khasagi (Private) Devi Ahilyabai Holkar Charitable Trust, through its trustees, against two tenants,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition by BSNL Against Arbitral Award — Challenge to Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Not Maintainable as Petition Filed Beyond Limitation and Without Proper Grounds. The court held that the writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable when an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is available, and the petition was filed beyond the limitation period without any application for condonation of delay.

3 Dec 2013

The petitioner, the General Manager of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Foreign Bank's Surrender of Licence Does Not Affect Pending Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal is determined at the time of filing the application and subsequent cessation of banking business does not oust its jurisdiction under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

23 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Isibars Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, had availed credit facilities from Commerzbank AG, a German ban...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Order in Rent Control Case — Landlord Failed to Prove Willful Default and Nuisance. The court held that mere delay in payment of rent does not constitute willful default under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, and that allegations of nuisance must be proved by cogent evidence.

7 Jan 2010

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant against the order of the learned Rent Controller, Nanded, who had dismissed the lan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Orders for Unauthorized Demolition and Reconstruction of Suit Premises. Tenant's Act of Demolishing Entire Structure and Erecting New Construction Without Landlord's Consent Constitutes Material Alteration and Forfeiture of Tenancy Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

18 Aug 2006

The petitioner, a tenant, was inducted into a suit premises comprising a room (14' x 14') with two tin sheet walls and a tin shed (9' x 9') at a month...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Tenancy Dispute, Upholds Respondent's Sole Entitlement to Suit Premises. Court Holds That Rent Receipts Are Best Evidence of Tenancy and Appellants Failed to Prove Joint Tenancy.

11 Jul 2006

The case involves a dispute over tenancy rights in a suit premises consisting of four rooms on the second floor of a building known as 'Haroon Manzil'...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Mesne Profits Claim in Ownership Dispute Over Flat. Court holds that plaintiffs established ownership of suit flat and defendants are liable to pay mesne profits for illegal occupation.

5 Jun 2006

The plaintiffs, Mrs. Tarla N. Morjaria, Mrs. Usha S. Somana, and Mrs. Bharati V. Tanna, filed a suit against the defendants, Mr. Bipin Hiralal Shah an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Acquisition for Housing and Rationing Facilities Upheld as Valid Public Purpose. The court held that the acquisition of land belonging to a public trust for providing housing and rationing facilities to the public is for a public purpose and the challenge after a long delay is not maintainable.

26 Sep 2005

The petitioner, Brahman Sahayak Sangh, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 and the Societies Registration Act, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact on Subletting Upheld. Tenant Failed to Prove Alleged Subletting by Landlord, and High Court Declined to Interfere Under Article 227 of the Constitution.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Dr. Bhaskar Shripad Galande, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the judgment and decree passed by...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)